Bad Logos: A Designer’s Guide On What Makes a Bad Logo and How To Avoid It


Logos are pivotal components that define a brand design and visual identity and serve as its recognizable face. A well-crafted logo is more than just a mere symbol; at first glance, it should be able to communicate a brand’s essence, values, and credibility. A great logo creates an immediate positive impression, effectively resonating with its audience and leaving a lasting imprint.

However, within the plethora of exceptional logos, there exists a spectrum where some fail to capture the essence or fail to connect with the audience, potentially impacting a brand adversely. It’s crucial to recognize the characteristics that differentiate a good logo from a bad one.

Beyond visual elements like color, layout, and typography, the success of a logo hinges on its ability to encapsulate the brand’s identity, communicate its message effectively, and distinguish it in a crowded marketplace. To understand what makes a bad logo, we will be taking a closer look at what makes a good logo. Continue reading this blog to learn about the qualities that create a bad logo, along with some examples of logos that missed the mark.

What are Bad Logos?

Bad logos are visual representations that fall short of effectively conveying a brand’s essence or message. They tend to lack fundamental qualities essential for a memorable and impactful design. Often, these logos suffer from issues such as lack of clarity, imbalance in design elements, complexity, or poor color choices. Their typography might be hard to read, or they could incorporate overly intricate graphics that hinder recognition. To put it simply, they mostly have design flaws, such as poor choice of colors, overly complex graphics, illegible typography, or inconsistent branding elements.

Inconsistency in branding elements can also contribute to a logo’s ineffectiveness. These subpar logos lead to confusion, hinder brand recognition, and diminish a company’s overall image, failing to connect with audiences or leave a lasting impression as intended.

What Makes a Bad Logo?

Several factors contribute to a logo being considered “bad.” Some of the common characteristics of a bad logo design include:

1. Complexity Over Simplicity

Logos that lean towards intricate designs rather than embracing simplicity risk overwhelming the audience. Overly detailed logos might have too many elements or intricate patterns, leading to visual clutter. Simplicity allows for easy recognition and comprehension, ensuring that the logo remains memorable across various mediums.

2. Illegible Typography

When a logo features typography that is challenging to read or decipher, it hampers the immediate understanding of the brand name or message. Fonts that lack clarity or are overly decorative can obscure the intended communication, reducing the logo’s effectiveness.

3. Inharmonious Color Choices

Poor color selections or clashing color combinations within a logo can create a jarring visual impact. Inappropriate color choices may distract from the intended message or fail to evoke the desired emotional response, weakening the logo’s overall appeal and memorability.

4. Overly Detailed Graphics

Logos that incorporate intricate or overly detailed graphics may overwhelm the viewer. Complex imagery or intricate illustrations can make it difficult for individuals to discern or recall the logo’s components, hindering instant recognition. Remember, that even a creative logo if not properly executed can appear wrong.

5. Inconsistency in Design

Lack of coherence in graphic design elements, such as variations in typography, color schemes, or graphic styles across different applications, can weaken the logo’s impact. Consistency fosters brand recognition and builds a cohesive brand image across diverse platforms.

6. Disconnect from Brand Values

Logos that fail to align with a brand’s core values, industry standards, or target audience may struggle to establish a meaningful connection. A lack of relevance to the brand’s identity can lead to confusion or disinterest among consumers.

7. Lack of Originality

Unoriginal or derivative logos that closely resemble other well-known brands can hinder a brand’s ability to stand out. Originality is crucial in forging a unique brand identity and fostering authenticity, helping the logo distinguish itself in a crowded marketplace.

8. Ineffective Scalability

Logos that lose visual clarity or legibility when resized for various applications limit their usability. A logo should maintain its integrity and remain recognizable across different sizes and formats to ensure versatility in marketing collateral.

9. Unbalanced Composition

Poorly arranged elements or unbalanced layouts within a logo can disrupt its visual harmony and coherence. An imbalance in design elements can create visual discomfort and detract from the logo’s aesthetic appeal and impact.

10. Failure to Reflect Brand Identity

Logos that do not encapsulate the essence, values, or personality of the brand may struggle to establish a distinctive identity. A successful logo design should effectively convey the brand’s character, evoking the intended emotions or perceptions among its audience.

These factors collectively contribute to a logo being deemed “bad” as they hinder its ability to effectively represent the brand, communicate a clear message, and leave a positive, memorable impression on the audience.

20 Examples of Bad Logos

Bad logos can significantly harm a brand’s image and business. They diminish brand recognition, create confusion, and fail to resonate with audiences. Ineffective logos convey unprofessionalism, weaken trust, and may deter potential customers, impacting a company’s reputation and hindering its success in the competitive market. Here’s a compilation of 20 logos displaying subpar design aspects such as unappealing branding, unfortunate color choices, or overlooked design elements, possibly crafted by inexperienced logo designers.

1. London 2012 Olympics Logo

London 2012 Olympics Logo

The London 2012 Olympics logo faced immense criticism, perceived by many as a contentious design. Its abstract and unconventional style, resembling graffiti-like shapes and jagged typography, evoked confusion and distaste among the public.

Critics found this retro logo design challenging to associate with the spirit of the Olympic Games, lacking clarity and failing to resonate with the event’s theme. Its divisive nature and departure from traditional Olympic emblems stirred controversy, making it an emblematic example of a logo widely regarded as a misstep in Olympic branding history.

2. Gap’s 2010 Logo Redesign

Gap's 2010 Logo Redesign

Gap’s 2010 logo redesign sparked significant backlash and swift action due to public outcry. The sudden shift from the iconic old logo in a blue box to a simple, Helvetica font design was met with disappointment and confusion. Customers voiced dissatisfaction with the lack of creativity and brand identity in the new logo, prompting a rapid reversal to the classic design within a week.

The redesign debacle showcased how a drastic departure from a well-established and beloved logo can trigger a negative response, emphasizing the importance of brand consistency and customer loyalty in logo design decisions.

3. Pepsi


Lawrence Yang’s artistic rendition of the Pepsi logo provided customers with a unique perspective, altering perceptions of the original design. This viral illustration compelled the public to contemplate Pepsi’s implications for health. The portrayal of an individual’s bloated stomach potentially dissuaded consumers from purchasing Pepsi, raising awareness of health consequences.

Despite its significant impact, Pepsi remained unresponsive to this depiction and retained its original logo, seemingly unfazed by the artwork’s critical message.

4. University of California’s 2012 Logo Redesign

University of California's 2012 Logo Redesign

The University of California’s 2012 logo redesign encountered vehement opposition and swift retraction. The abrupt shift from the traditional crest-style logo to a modern, block-letter emblem was met with staunch disapproval from students, alumni, and the public. The minimalistic and contemporary design was criticized for lacking the university’s historic legacy and esteemed tradition.

The overwhelmingly negative reaction prompted the university to retract the redesigned logo within days, highlighting the significance of respecting a brand’s heritage and the passionate connection stakeholders have with established institutional symbols.

5. Airbnb’s Logo Redesign

Airbnb's Logo Redesign

Airbnb’s logo redesign was met with diverse reactions. The company aimed to symbolize belonging and diversity with a new logo resembling a “Bélo,” representing people, places, and love. However, the symbol sparked varied interpretations, some seeing it as resembling private body parts or simply confusing it.

While aiming for a deeper connection with its community, the logo’s ambiguous nature resulted in mixed opinions, illustrating the challenge of creating universally understood and appreciated symbols in logo redesigns.

6. Kudawara Pharmacy

Kudawara Pharmacy

The logo represents Kudawara Pharmacy, yet its depiction raises eyebrows. A pharmacy’s business is far removed from the suggestive imagery portrayed. The decision to position heads on either end of the letter ‘K’ remains a perplexing design choice. Unfortunately, this unconventional approach transforms what could have been a straightforward and respectable logo into one that’s seen as cheap, humorous, and undeniably inappropriate.

Depicting two individuals seemingly engaged in leisure within the letter ‘K’ of a pharmacy logo creates an inexplicable and nonsensical association, significantly detracting from its intended purpose.

7. The 2016 Rio Olympics Logo

The 2016 Rio Olympics Logo

The 2016 Rio Olympics logo was met with criticism due to its unconventional design. Intended to represent passion and transformation, the logo featured an abstract emblem resembling multicolored human figures embracing. However, it faced controversy for its perceived lack of connection to Rio’s culture and for being overly abstract, making it difficult for some to interpret.

Critics argued it failed to capture the essence of the host city, highlighting the challenge of creating logos that resonate with diverse audiences and reflect the spirit of the event.

8. A-Style


The A-Style logo, seemingly unrelated to a clothing business, stands out as a notorious emblem, provoking both laughter and critique. Initially deployed as part of a “Guerilla Marketing” campaign before the brand’s establishment, yellow stickers bearing this logo adorned Italian streets, sparking speculation about its meaning. Interestingly, clothing wasn’t among the anticipated guesses.

The logo’s imagery, featuring two heads forming the letter ‘A’ engaged in a suggestive activity, emerged long before the A-Style brand’s product launch. While it garnered global attention, it landed in the realm of worst logos, serving as an unintentional yet notorious example of poorly executed branding strategies.

9. The Pizza Hut Logo Redesign

The Pizza Hut Logo Redesign

The Pizza Hut logo redesign aimed to modernize the brand’s visual identity by introducing a cleaner and more contemporary logo. The iconic red roof element was simplified, and the overall design underwent a more streamlined approach. While the revamp intended to convey a fresh and updated image, opinions were mixed.

Some appreciated the cleaner look, perceiving it as a step toward modernization, while others criticized the departure from the nostalgic red roof, which they associated with the brand’s heritage. The redesign exemplified the challenge of balancing tradition with contemporary aesthetics to satisfy a diverse customer base.

10. The 2018 Slack Logo Redesign

The 2018 Slack Logo Redesign

The 2018 Slack logo redesign aimed to present a more refined and versatile symbol. Transitioning from the iconic hashtag logo to a simpler octothorpe design, it sought a modern and adaptable visual identity. However, reactions were diverse.

Some appreciated the streamlined appearance and adaptability for various applications, while others criticized it for being too plain and losing the distinctiveness of the original logo. The redesign underscored the difficulty of modernizing a recognizable logo while maintaining its essence, highlighting the challenge of satisfying both aesthetic and functional needs in branding updates.

11. The 2010 Verizon Logo Redesign

The 2010 Verizon Logo Redesign

Verizon redesigned its logo design in 2010 to modernize the telecommunications giant’s visual identity. The updated design streamlined the familiar red checkmark and adjusted the font to a sleeker style. While the redesign intended to signal a contemporary image, opinions were divided.

Some praised the cleaner and more modern look, perceiving it as a step toward a refreshed brand, while others criticized it for lacking the distinctive appeal of the previous logo. The redesign underscored the challenge of evolving a well-established logo to resonate with changing times while preserving brand recognition and customer loyalty.

12. The 2016 Uber Logo Redesign

The 2016 Uber Logo Redesign

In 2016, Uber redesigned its logo design to make it more modern and inclusive, departing from its traditional ‘U’ symbol. It embraced a geometric, symbol-less design, featuring a futuristic display of atomized bits symbolizing diversity and dynamism. The rebrand aimed to convey innovation and connectivity but faced criticism for its abstract nature, causing confusion among users.

The shift in design from the familiar ‘U’ emblem raised skepticism, with many perceiving it as a deviation from the brand’s identity. Despite the attempt to embrace change and signify evolution, the redesign received mixed responses, highlighting the challenge of revamping a well-established brand identity.

13. Catholic Church’s Archdiocesan Youth Commission

Catholic Church’s Archdiocesan Youth Commission

The intention behind a church’s logo is to symbolize a priest safeguarding a child, signifying protection. However, if perceived differently, the logo conveys a contradictory and alarming message, contradicting its original purpose. Despite its release during a more optimistic period, the logo’s potential negative interpretation remains concerning.

The Archdiocesan Youth Commission of the Catholic Church’s logo inadvertently sidesteps the stereotypes related to ministerial attitudes toward children. Unfortunately, the logo’s unintended implications overlook the crucial message, rendering it ineffective and classified as an unfortunate representation.

14. NYC TAXI Logo


The NYC taxi service logo, aiming to represent the city’s diverse cultures, has faced criticism for its confusing design. The use of subway signs spelling ‘T’ and ‘AXI’ separately has garnered disapproval.

Many logo designers expressed concerns about its aesthetic, finding it intentionally rough and resembling a Checker car more than a sleek Crown Vic. The attempt to blend the NYC logo with a ‘T’ in a circle appears awkward, and the overall execution of cab exteriors seems less compelling than anticipated from its initial concept.

15. Locum


Locum, a Swedish property management company, presents a logo that’s stirred debate. It’s widely criticized, and considered among the worst logos due to its unintentional resemblance to an English word. In a festive gesture in 1991, they replaced the “o” with a heart on Christmas cards, inadvertently causing potential misunderstandings among recipients.

This unintentional branding blunder highlights the impact of overlooked design elements and the unintended interpretations that can lead to a logo’s infamy.

16. Arlington Pediatric Center

Arlington Pediatric Center

Though this is a logo for the pediatric center, the placement of the subjects in the logo changes the whole dynamics of the logo. The logo designer seems to have inappropriate intentions as he designed the logo of a pediatric center in a way that discomforts the child.

How the adult in the picture is looking towards the kid and the position and posture shown in the image have made the logo merely disgusting. Certainly, it is not the kind of pediatric center that any parent would be interested in going to, inappropriate placement of the child in the logo.

17. Office of Government Commerce (OGC) Logo

Office of Government Commerce (OGC) Logo

The Office of Government Commerce (OGC) initially presented a seemingly straightforward and decent logo, yet faced widespread criticism as it was deemed a design failure. Critics highlighted its deficiency in portraying symbolism relevant to the organization’s purpose, failing to resonate with the public.

An additional concern arose upon a shift in perspective – a ninety-degree clockwise rotation revealed an unintended, unsettling resemblance to an ambiguous and potentially inappropriate image. This underscored the necessity for designers to scrutinize logos from various angles to ensure their simplicity and appropriateness from all viewpoints.

18. NSW Government

NSW Government

The New South Wales state government allocated a considerable budget to commission a logo that would encapsulate the essence of the Australian state, intending to feature the distinctive waratah flower. Unfortunately, the resultant design bore a remarkable resemblance to the Indian lotus, deviating significantly from the intended representation.

This misalignment between the expected waratah depiction and the logo’s final appearance led to ongoing debates and critiques. Regarded as a stark example of design missteps, this logo continues to provoke discussions within the design community, serving as a cautionary tale about the importance of precision and accuracy in emblematic representations.

19. Aldershot & Farnborough Twins & Triplets Club

Aldershot & Farnborough Twins & Triplets Club

An organization dedicated to offering guidance and products for twins and triplets like Aldershot & Farnborough Twins & Triplets Club should prioritize thoughtful design. Yet, the placement of the third child in their logo is amiss. This instance, featured in the compilation of poorly designed logos, pertains to a community of multiples.

However, the positioning of the third child appears misplaced, indicating a potential oversight by the creators. The questionable placement raises concerns about the lack of attention to detail or sensitivity in the logo’s design making it a great example of a bad logo design.

20. Bureau of Health Promotions

Bureau of Health Promotions

The BHP (Bureau of Health Promotion) introduced a logo featuring an inappropriate image nestled inside the circle. Depicting a threesome, this imagery seems unjustified, particularly for an organization dealing with sexual health and education. The unnecessary graphic raises questions about the motive behind such a portrayal, serving no purpose but to garner attention.

Regrettably, this misstep jeopardizes the brand’s integrity, leaving the public puzzled about the organization’s focus on health promotion. The logo’s ambiguity stands as a prime example of confusion in branding, failing to convey the bureau’s specific health-related emphasis, prompting speculation about the creators’ intentions.

These examples illustrate how certain design elements or choices can detract from a logo’s effectiveness, potentially impacting a brand’s identity or messaging.

How to Design a Strong Brand Logo

Designing a powerful brand logo is a crucial aspect of establishing a distinct identity in today’s competitive market. Here’s an in-depth guide:

1. Understand Brand Identity: Start by defining your brand’s core values, mission, and target audience. Your logo should embody these elements to communicate the essence of your brand to consumers.

2. Simplicity and Memorability: A simple logo is more recognizable and memorable. Consider iconic logos like Nike’s swoosh or Apple’s apple silhouette. Strive for a design that is easy to understand and remember.

3. Versatility and Adaptability: Your logo should look appealing and maintain its impact across various platforms, sizes, and mediums. It should work equally well in color or black and white and on different backgrounds.

4. Uniqueness and Originality: Stand out from competitors by creating a unique logo that reflects your brand’s individuality. Avoid clichés or overly generic designs to make a lasting impression.

5. Color, Fonts, and Visual Elements: Choose colors and fonts that align with your brand’s personality and resonate with your target audience. Visual elements like shapes and symbols can also convey meaning and evoke emotions.

6. Scalability and Consistency: Your logo should remain clear and recognizable when scaled down or enlarged. It should maintain consistency across all applications, reinforcing your brand’s identity.

7. Testing and Feedback: Before finalizing your logo, gather feedback from focus groups, potential customers, or professional designers. Understand their perceptions and make necessary adjustments to improve the design.

8. Professional Design: While DIY logo creation tools exist, hiring a professional designer often yields superior results. Experienced designers understand design principles, trends, and the psychology behind effective logos.

9. Adaptability for Digital Platforms: Ensure your logo is optimized for digital platforms, including websites, social media profiles, mobile apps, and more.

10. Legal Considerations: Finally, consider trademarking your logo to protect your brand identity and prevent potential infringement issues in the future.

Remember, your logo is the face of your brand and will be an integral part of your marketing efforts. Investing time and resources into creating a well-thought-out logo is a worthwhile endeavor that can significantly contribute to your brand’s success

Start Creating Better-Looking Logos

The presence of bad logos underscores the critical importance of effective design in brand identity. These examples highlight the potential repercussions of design missteps, from lack of clarity to inappropriate imagery, adversely impacting a brand’s reputation. Understanding the principles of good design, simplicity, clarity, and relevance remains paramount. Bad logos serve as cautionary tales, emphasizing the need for thorough research, creativity, and meticulous execution in logo creation.

By learning from these examples, brands can navigate towards creating impactful, memorable, and meaningful logos that authentically represent their identity, resonate with audiences, and foster positive brand perception in the competitive landscape of visual identity.

January 5, 2024
10 min read
12 reads

Impress your customers with cutting-edge graphics!
By signing up, you agree to All Time Design's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Thank you for subscribe!

Ready to create more
designs for lesser costs?

Start your 14-day free trial
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.